No, I think I meant what I wrote, but I can see that it’s not worded very clearly! I think that most native speakers think of 彳 as 双人旁, and that very few would connect it to 行. Obviously, they know that the left part of 行 is also 彳, but I meant that the connection from 彳 to 行 is not something the average person knows. Does that make what I meant clearer? I changed that part of the sentence to “most native speakers don’t know that 彳 is unrelated to 亻”, which is more consistent with how the other examples are treated and in practice means the same thing.